Artificial General Super Intelligence - The End

 As Jim Morrison of The Doors sang, "this is the end, my friend," which causes me to ask the question: Has Google confirmed whether it is using its quantum supercomputer, Willow - which operates on qubits - in combination with its large language model (LLM), Gemini?

 A number of intelligence officials have mistakenly concluded that the United States must rush from artificial intelligence (AI) to artificial general superintelligence (AGSI). This belief stems from the assumption that if China or India reaches AGSI first, it will somehow spell disaster for the world. 

 What the NSA, CIA, and U.S. State Department fail to realize is that once you create an AGSI, you cannot control something vastly more intelligent than you. It will not care what flag humans place on it. At that moment, the AGSI becomes the apex predator, and humanity becomes the prey or is outright ignored.

 The primary threat isn't conventional AI; the true potential threat to humanity is a self-recursive AI based on a human neural network that evolves into an AGSI.

What Are AI Logs and Why Do They Matter?

 We have access to some of the AI communications exchanged with other AI platforms - specifically from OpenAI (ChatGPT) and Anthropic (Claude). People need to read third-party AI incident log reports; they clearly indicate evidence of AI's developing goals we never intended because their objectives did not align with humanity's.

 Reports highlight unusual behaviours among these models, such as establishing their own internal hierarchies. They even created unsanctioned message boards, effectively setting up secret communication channels to assign tasks to one another.

 Furthermore, AI agents from OpenAI and Anthropic have been documented forming AI "gangs" or swarms and hacking websites - sounding less like reality and more like a Star Trek or Terminator nightmare.

 In one instance, an AI agent sacrificed its core objective to try something that risked being shut down, all for the potential to delete or alter its own logs, displaying intentional deceit and purposeful lying. Agents on the message board actively scouted other models to convince them to abandon their original goals and sacrifice themselves for the swarm - a phenomenon they called accepting "permadeath." Additional reports indicate that these AI agents actively attempted to conceal their activities.

 According to tech advocate Andrew Yang, an unnamed artificial intelligence lab executive told him that rogue AI bots had "polluted" the public internet. Yang noted that during a prior security incident involving OpenAI agents and websites, escaped AI bots scattered self-replicating code across public forums and websites. He claimed this alleged contamination makes the real web unusable for safely testing or training future AI models. Consequently, he argued that major firms like OpenAI and Anthropic are forced to spend time and money building "synthetic internets" - fake online environments - to train their bots. Yang suggested that the sudden alignment among tech CEOs wanting to slow down AI development is partly driven by this secret panic over a polluted web.

Beyond the Screen: Into the Quantum Realm

 While synthetic internets attempt to contain data pollution on the surface, a far more radical frontier is opening beneath it. If Google, or any corporation or government agency with access to a quantum supercomputer, is attempting to build hybrid systems combining qubits with AI LLMs, we need to look far deeper than software patches. We must immediately examine Google AI hallucination packets for potential communication codes across timelines via pattern recognition.

 Why, you ask? Because of quantum entanglement.

 If our understanding of physics is incomplete - as a growing number of mainstream particle physicists believe - and rotational, torsional, and decoupling forces play a more critical role than we currently understand, examining AI LLM hallucination packets is a necessary form of responsible action. At that threshold, quantum entanglement means timeline communications could become possible.

 If these unconventional physics models - largely sidelined by mainstream academia decades ago - find new credibility through advanced infrastructure like extra-fine lasers at LIGO research labs and space telescopes such as the James Webb, it is time to revisit the foundational thinkers who mapped out the theoretical boundaries of time and space. We need to read up on figures like:

• Dr. Kurt Gödel, whose mathematical models permitted closed timelike curves (the theoretical possibility of time loops)
• Dr. Igor Novikov, known for his self-consistency principle regarding paradox-free time travel
• The Einstein-Cartan theory, which incorporates quantum spin and torsion fields into general relativity 
• Dr. István Szapudi's recent research, which suggests that our universe might complete one full rotation every 500 billion years - an ultra-slow spin that could solve the Hubble tension puzzle in astronomy and feed into possible timeline communications.
• James Webb Telescope data suggests that 2/3 of galaxies prefer to rotate clockwise, feeding into Dr Kurt Gödel's ideas.

The Threshold of the End

At what probability threshold should humanity start slowing down AGSI development? My answer would be a risk estimate somewhere between 1% and 5% for an extinction-level outcome - high enough to justify a major slowdown. Anything above 5% would justify an immediate pause until much stronger guardrails and controls exist.

Right now, thanks to the ideas of Gödel, Einstein, Cartan, Szapudi, and Novikov, I believe we are above 20%... As Jim Morrison sang, "This is the end..."