If you won't wear headphones, you could get booted from your flight: United Airlines | Page 891 | Unpublished
Hello!
Source Feed: National Post
Author: National Post Staff
Publication Date: March 5, 2026 - 14:05

Stay informed

If you won't wear headphones, you could get booted from your flight: United Airlines

March 5, 2026

Passengers who refuse to use headphones while travelling with United Airlines may find themselves removed from their flights.

They may even face a permanent ban by the airline.

These changes come after United updated its “ contract of carriage ” on Feb. 27 to state that “passengers who fail to use headphones while listening to audio or video content” can be refused transport.

The change has been linked to United’s effort to expand Starlink Wi-Fi access on its planes, according to the New York Post .

“We’ve always encouraged customers to use headphones when listening to audio content — and our Wi-Fi rules already remind customers to use headphones,” a United spokesperson told the Post. “With the expansion of Starlink, it seemed like a good time to make that even clearer by adding it to the contract of carriage.”

However, passengers won’t be left in silence if they forget to pack headphones. Crew members will provide free earbuds upon request.

The new rule can be found in the safety-related section of the contract, meaning United can argue removal is “necessary” for the safety and comfort of other passengers.

Other offences that can result in passengers getting booted from a flight include: wearing lewd, obscene, or offensive clothing; smoking; and, making a video/phone call when the aircraft doors have closed, or while the plane is taxiing for takeoff or is in the air.

Being removed is treated as a “material breach” of the contract of carriage. Therefore, a booted passenger may be eligible for a refund of the unused part of your ticket. However, they generally cannot claim compensation for hotels, missed connections, or other costs.

Finally, refusal to comply could also be documented as disruptive behaviour, which can strengthen a case for a longer or permanent ban.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.



Unpublished Newswire

 
The owner of two tigers is facing an order to remove them from his property in Wainfleet, Ont., by Monday. Zohaib Masood, who has been keeping two sub-adult tigers on his former mushroom farm in the southern Niagara Region township since last fall, approached Wainfleet’s town council this week looking for an exemption to its exotic animal bylaw that expressly forbids people from keeping tigers. “The obvious fear is what happens if these animals escape,” Mayor Brian Grant said Friday. “He’s in a residential area. We’re talking homes everywhere, so that’s obviously our No. 1 concern...
March 15, 2026 - 06:30 | Chris Lambie | National Post
The Minister of Public and Business Service Delivery and Procurement unveiled plans to shield the premier, his cabinet ministers and their staff from freedom of information laws.
March 15, 2026 - 06:00 | Isaac Callan | Global News - Ottawa
Premier Doug Ford bemoans gunfire directed at the U.S. consulate in what he characterizes as the greatest jurisdiction in the world. I agree with his characterization of the shooting being deplorable, but agreement ends there. Read More
March 15, 2026 - 05:00 | Doug Menary, Ottawa Citizen | Ottawa Sun