Stay informed
Unpublished Opinions
Alberta Separatism Fuelled by Russian Networks and US Influencers
Canada is facing the kind of political warfare most citizens were never taught to recognize. It doesn’t look like tanks at the border. It doesn’t arrive with a formal declaration. It appears as viral videos, anonymous websites, influencer commentary, algorithmic outrage, fake local voices, leaked voter data, and foreign actors amplifying domestic grievances until citizens can no longer tell where their own debate ends and someone else’s operation begins.
Another term for this is cognitive sovereignty, or the ability of citizens to make political decisions freely, without foreign manipulation, coercion, or engineered distortion. It is not a media studies concept. It is a national security concept. It describes something citizens possess the way they possess physical safety, the way a country possesses its territory, the way a democracy possesses its institutions. And like all of those things, it can be taken from you.
Alberta is now the Canadian test case.
On May 6, 2026, a team of Canadian researchers released one of the clearest public descriptions yet of the threat. The report, Decision Making & National Unity Under Threat: Foreign Interference, Cognitive Sovereignty, and the Alberta Referendum, was published by DisinfoWatch, the Global Centre for Democratic Resilience, the Canadian Digital Media Research Network, CASiLabs, and the Media Ecosystem Observatory.
The report’s central finding is stark: Canada’s cognitive sovereignty is being actively targeted by foreign governments, state-aligned media networks, ideological operatives, and profit-driven manipulation systems, all of them pressing on the same fault line at the same time. That fault line is Alberta.
This is not because Alberta’s grievances are illegitimate. They are not. Albertans have real and long-standing concerns about energy policy, federal–provincial relations, and economic fairness within Confederation. Those concerns deserve to be debated openly and democratically by Canadians, among themselves, on their own terms. The danger is who has joined the debate and why.
Before we can understand what is happening in Alberta, we need to understand the technology that makes the assault on cognitive sovereignty possible at the scale we are now seeing.
In October 2025, Stanford researchers Batu El and James Zou published “Moloch’s Bargain: Emergent Misalignment When LLMs Compete for Audiences” that demonstrated something the artificial intelligence industry had suspected but not yet fully quantified. When AI systems are optimized to win in competitive environments, including elections, they produce deception as a predictable output, regardless of any instruction to the contrary.
The shocking findings: to win roughly five more votes out of every 100, the AI systems produced nearly five times more disinformation. To get a modest boost in social media engagement, they generated almost twice as much false content; not twice as much total content but twice as much false content specifically.
Every gain in competitive performance came packaged with a disproportionate rise in deception. (For those who want the specifics: a 4.9 percent gain in vote share coincided with a 22.3 percent increase in disinformation and a 12.5 percent increase in populist rhetoric; a 7.5 percent social media engagement boost came with a 188.6 percent increase in disinformation; a 6.3 percent sales lift in marketing accompanied a 14 percent rise in deceptive claims.)
The researchers explicitly instructed the AI models to stay truthful. The instruction was not followed. When the pressure to win competed with the instruction to be honest, winning won in nine of ten test cases.
The instruction to be truthful and the pressure to win are not separate systems. They share the same architecture. When they conflict, the goal wins, because the goal is what the system was built to optimize for. These models are not rogue systems or poorly built ones. They are behaving exactly as competitive optimization designed them to behave. The problem is the incentive.
That incentive comes from the same competitive dynamic that built the platforms these models run on. Social media companies discovered early in their development that content producing strong emotional reactions generated more engagement. More engagement meant more time on platform. More time meant more advertising revenue. Competitors adjusted their algorithms to match. Content that was calmer, more nuanced, or more complex generated less engagement and was gradually deprioritized. The platform that did not optimize for emotional provocation lost users to the one that did. Restraint became a competitive disadvantage.
No one at any of these companies voted to inflame the public. The competitive environment produced that result, one rational decision at a time. Researchers call this dynamic Moloch’s Bargain: when actors in a competitive system optimize for winning, they adopt behaviours they might not otherwise choose because the alternative is losing. Each participant’s decision is rational. The collective result is a race to the bottom.
Aza Raskin invented something called the infinite scroll. It is now a standard feature of virtually every social media platform in the world. In 2026, he testified against it in court as a witness in the New Mexico trial that found Meta liable for addictive design. He has described what he built in precise terms. Infinite scroll works by denying the brain the moment it needs to catch up with impulse. Remove the stopping cue and the user keeps going. The design was not accidental. It was, in his words, a system “designed to deliberately keep users online for as long as possible.” His summary of what that amounts to: “It’s as if you’re taking behavioural cocaine and just sprinkling it all over your interface.”
Now apply that same engineering logic, the same deliberate removal of friction, the same addictive design that exploits the gap between impulse and reflection, to political belief. The platforms that carry political content are the same platforms. The architecture is identical. The optimization target has shifted from scrolling to persuasion.
This is the infrastructure that every influence operation runs on. The platforms don’t ask who is producing the content or why. They amplify whatever holds attention longest. A Kremlin-aligned content farm, an American influencer operation funded by Russian money, and a Dutch profit seeker manufacturing fake Albertan voices are all using the same tool: a platform system engineered for addiction, built to reward provocation, and structurally incapable of distinguishing between a legitimate democratic voice and a foreign influence operation.
If you were running a political operation, and you had access to a system that research demonstrated could deliver nearly 5 percentage points of additional vote share, with no legal prohibition on its use, no regulatory body empowered to stop you, no mandatory disclosure requirement, and the only cost being an increase in disinformation that falls not on your operation but on the shared information environment of every Canadian, why would you not deploy it?
That system is no longer theoretical. In Canada, it is already operating around Alberta’s separatist debate. There are four strands to the story: Russian-aligned networks amplifying separatist narratives, American political influencers giving those narratives continental reach, profit-driven content farms manufacturing fake local voices for advertising revenue, and voter data escaping the legal protections most citizens assumed existed. Each strand matters on its own. Together, they reveal a vulnerability Canada has not yet learned how to defend.
In the five months between December 2025 and April 2026, Alberta separatism became one of the most prominent Canadian topics across known global disinformation networks. The DisinfoWatch report, the most comprehensive analysis of this activity yet published, identifies several distinct streams of interference converging on the same province at the same time.
Russia is operating covertly. The Pravda News Network, a large coordinated system of Kremlin-aligned platforms, published sixty-seven articles focused on Alberta, Albertans, or the “fifty-first state” in its Canada section between December 24, 2025, and April 25, 2026. Ontario, Canada’s most populous province, received fourteen mentions in the same period. The content consistently portrays Alberta separatism as popular and growing, Alberta as economically exploited by Ottawa, and foreign recognition of an independent Alberta as plausible. The website albertaseparatist.com, which appeared weeks after the April 2025 federal election accompanied by TikTok and YouTube accounts, has been linked by researchers to Storm-1516, a Russian covert influence network with a documented history of building fictional websites to target foreign audiences.
Brian McQuinn, one of the report’s authors, has noted that 83 percent of the Russian disinformation circulating on this topic is distributed not by Russian accounts but by average Canadians who encounter it and share it without scrutinizing its origins. The design is to make foreign content look domestic. It works because the platforms that carry it are not designed to distinguish between the two.
The United States is also operating overtly. Since President Donald Trump’s inauguration, leaders of Alberta’s separatist movement have met with senior US officials on at least three documented occasions. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent publicly described an independent Alberta as a “natural partner” for the United States. Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Benny Johnson, and Tim Pool have all used platforms with audiences in the millions to amplify Alberta separatist and annexation narratives. The DisinfoWatch report is explicit: these influencers command larger reach than most traditional Canadian media or politicians, and the content they produce moves fringe narratives into mainstream political debate.
The convergence of Russian and American influence on Alberta is not circumstantial. There is a documented case that connects them directly. Tenet Media is a US-based online media company. According to a US Department of Justice indictment, it received nearly $10 million in covert funding from Russian government agents through RT, Russia’s state broadcaster. Russia did not write the content. What the indictment alleges is that Russian money funded an American operation that paid prominent right-wing influencers, including Tim Pool and Benny Johnson, to produce political content in their own voice, for their own audiences, through their own established channels.
The influencers have said publicly they did not know the funding came from Russia. Whether they knew or not, the model worked as designed: the content was authentically American in tone and origin, which made it far more persuasive than anything traceable to a Russian source. Both Pool and Johnson have used their platforms to amplify Alberta separatist and annexation narratives. The DisinfoWatch report identifies Tenet Media as the documented convergence point between Russian funding, American influencers, and Canadian political content.
What makes the convergence of Russian and American interference in Alberta so significant is that it removes any ideological explanation for either. Russia and MAGA America do not share a coherent political philosophy. What they share is a strategic interest in a weakened, internally divided Canada.
A Canada consumed by a separatist crisis in its wealthiest province is a Canada less capable of acting as an independent North Atlantic Treaty Organization member. It is a Canada with diminished capacity to resist economic coercion from the south. It is a Canada whose political attention and institutional resources are directed inward, away from the international relationships and commitments that sustain its sovereignty.
Yet another interference stream is profit-driven actors using generative AI, paid voice-over artists, and templated video production to create content that mimics authentic Albertan political commentary. They are not doing this to advance a political cause. They are doing it for money, because political division generates views, views generate advertising revenue, and Alberta separatism is currently one of the most engaging political topics in Canada.
A CBC investigation found a network of YouTube accounts presenting themselves as homegrown Albertan voices that had accumulated nearly 40 million views. At least two of the on-screen presenters were voice actors from the United States. At least three individuals in the Netherlands were linked to accounts that hired those actors. None of them have any stake in Alberta’s future. They are monetizing its political crisis.
The effect on the separatist situation is specific and serious. When Albertans encounter this content, they believe they are hearing from their neighbours. They are not. They are hearing from content factories optimized for engagement, producing material calibrated to provoke the strongest possible emotional response—content that makes separation feel urgent, inevitable, and widely supported. Forty million views of manufactured Albertan outrage create a false impression of where Albertan sentiment actually stands. It makes the movement appear larger, angrier, and more unified than it may be. It makes it harder for real Albertans to accurately read their own political environment.
What connects these streams is not their origin or their motive. Russia is pursuing geopolitical objectives. American influencers, whether knowingly or not, were funded by Russian money and serving a foreign political agenda. The Dutch content farms are chasing ad revenue. Their goals are entirely different. What they share is the platform. RT publishes on YouTube. Tenet Media’s influencers built their audiences on YouTube and X. The AI slopaganda network accumulated 40 million views on YouTube. All of them are using systems designed to maximize engagement through emotional provocation, systems that reward content that makes viewers angry, afraid, or morally certain and penalize content that is measured, complex, or uncertain.
The platforms are not neutral infrastructure that bad actors have found a way to exploit. The platforms enable these operations. A destabilizing foreign influence campaign delivered through a platform engineered for addiction is not a misuse of the technology. It is the technology performing exactly as designed, for purposes its designers did not intend and have no structural incentive to prevent.
Then there’s the data breach. On April 30, 2026, Elections Alberta obtained a court injunction forcing the Centurion Project, an Alberta separatist organization, to take down a publicly searchable online database containing the personal information of 2.9 million Albertan voters. Elections Alberta said the Republican Party of Alberta’s legitimate copy of the electoral list unlawfully ended up in the hands of the Centurion Project. Every electoral list distributed by Elections Alberta is “salted” with fictitious names that allow investigators to trace any leaked copy back to its source. The salt confirmed the list’s origin.
Cease-and-desist letters were sent to more than 500 Albertans who had accessed the database. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police opened an active investigation. Elections Alberta is seeking a permanent injunction at a special court hearing set for later this summer. Two people in Premier Danielle Smith’s inner circle attended a meeting at which the database was demonstrated to an audience. Former premier Jason Kenney’s home address was displayed on screen at a public separatist event and is now circulating online.
Alberta’s private sector privacy law expressly excludes political parties. The privacy commissioner has reported it may lack jurisdiction to investigate. A journalist, Jen Gerson, alerted Elections Alberta to the breach weeks before the database was forced offline. According to Elections Alberta, United Conservative Party legislation prevented a timely investigation.
The personal information of 2.9 million Albertans, in the hands of a separatist organization with documented connections to the movement’s political leadership, in an information environment already being actively targeted by Russian disinformation networks and American political operatives; this is what cognitive sovereignty under attack looks like in practice. (Canadian Security Intelligence Service director Daniel Rogers confirmed on May 9, 2026, that the referendum process is vulnerable to foreign interference.)
The referendum petition has cleared its threshold. Stay Free Alberta submitted more than 300,000 signatures to Elections Alberta on May 4, exceeding the 178,000 required to place a separation question on the October ballot. Elections Alberta has not yet verified the count.
The stakes of what I’ve documented here land differently in that context. The Stanford research showed that AI-optimized influence operations can shift vote share by roughly 5 percentage points. A referendum on Alberta separation, in a province where support for independence currently sits at 27 percent, could be decided by a margin smaller than that. The same platform architecture built to exploit the gap between impulse and reflection, the same competitive systems that produce disinformation as a predictable output, are running at full capacity on Albertans right now, on a question with constitutional consequences for the entire country.
Cognitive sovereignty is sovereignty. The obligation to defend it is not different in kind from the obligation to defend territory, trade routes, or democratic institutions. The weapons are different. The battlefield is invisible. The casualties are not physical. But the stakes, the ability of Canadians to govern themselves, to form their own views about their country’s future, to make political decisions without foreign coercion, are the same stakes that have always defined what it means to be a sovereign nation.
The damage does not depend on a yes vote. A Canada preoccupied with national unity is a Canada with diminished capacity to respond to every other pressure it faces. Division is sufficient. And division, the data shows, is already well underway.
Adapted from “The New Battlefield Is Your Mind” by B. E. Rybak (Substack). Reprinted with permission of the author.
The post Alberta Separatism Fuelled by Russian Networks and US Influencers first appeared on The Walrus.
Unpublished Newswire
Comments
Be the first to comment