Liberals pull out 'guillotine' motion to shut down debate on police search powers bill | Page 19 | Unpublished
Hello!
Source Feed: National Post
Author: Christopher Nardi
Publication Date: June 16, 2026 - 11:45

Stay informed

Liberals pull out 'guillotine' motion to shut down debate on police search powers bill

June 16, 2026

OTTAWA — The majority Liberal government is pulling out the “guillotine” for one of its most contentious pieces of legislation, moving to give MPs until Friday to pass its controversial bill facilitating police and intelligence agencies’ ability to intercept and collect personal information.

Late Monday, Government House Leader tabled a sweeping motion that would effectively put an end to clause-by-clause debate of Bill C-22 at committee by Thursday night and put an end to the second reading stage. The motion then gives the government the ability to limit third reading debate to a single MP from each party.

That means that, if the motion is passed in the House of Commons, the Liberals can push through their embattled Bill C-22 by the end of the week when MPs go home for the summer recess. The motion is particularly aggressive in that it aims to curb debate on multiple debate stages of the bill.

Such time allocation and closure motions are colloquially referred to as a “guillotine” because they cut off debate after a certain amount of time.

Bill C-22 proposes a new lawful access regime which would make it easier for police and intelligence agencies to intercept private communications or personal data as part of their investigations.

Lawful access is one of the most intrusive powers afforded to police and intelligence agencies. Creating such a regime for the digital age in Canada has been the subject of fierce debate for decades.

The bill is strongly supported by police services across Canada and CSIS, who argue that their investigations into serious crimes like extortion, terrorism or child sex abuse material are significantly hampered because of Canada’s lack of a modern-day lawful access regime.

But there has been a recent groundswell of opposition against the bill by civil liberties advocates and tech companies like Apple, Meta and Google who argue that the bill goes too far and could significantly undermine Canadians’ right to privacy.

The move is almost certainly going to be fiercely opposed by opposition parties, who have repeatedly called for further debate on the controversial bill.

Bill C-22 is currently at committee study, where MPs have spent over a dozen hours debating roughly 10 of the over 100 amendments proposed by Liberals, Conservatives, the Bloc Québécois, the NDP and the Green Party.

More to come.

National Post

cnardi@postmedia.com

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.



Unpublished Newswire

 
For 15 years in the 1980s and ‘90s, pedestrians navigating the underpass at Rideau Street and Colonel By Drive were met by Terry Fox. Read More
July 4, 2026 - 04:00 | Bruce Deachman | Ottawa Citizen
Re: EDITORIAL: On the horns of a unicorn dilemma. Is Alto a nation-builder or a waste of money? Online, June 24 Read More
July 4, 2026 - 04:00 | Doug Menary, Ottawa Citizen | Ottawa Sun
My heart goes out to the organisers of the Canada Day festivities. This has to be a major emotional let down. I was director of events at the NCC in the 80's and I remember very well, the days prior to July 1, the great degree of anxieties we all lived through at the office. A whole year of planning, searching the country for artists and ideas — too many activities to list in this short note. We were constantly glued to the weather forecasts. So many commitments with artists, suppliers, stage managers/workers, Parliament Hill set up (no LeBreton Flats then), hundreds of volunteers etc.,...
July 4, 2026 - 04:00 | Robert Hiltz | Ottawa Citizen