Baird’s Gold Standard on Saudi Human Rights | Unpublished

Warning message

  • Last import of users from Drupal Production environment ran more than 7 days ago. Import users by accessing /admin/config/live-importer/drupal-run
  • Last import of nodes from Drupal Production environment ran more than 7 days ago. Import nodes by accessing /admin/config/live-importer/drupal-run

Unpublished Opinions's picture
Ottawa, Ontario
About the author

Morgan Duchesney is an Ottawa writer and martial arts instructor committed to adding context to public discourse on issues of national and international importance. His works on political economy, war, commerce and martial arts have appeared in Adbusters, Humanistic Perspectives, the Ottawa Citizen and the National Library of Australia. 

Like it

Baird’s Gold Standard on Saudi Human Rights

August 25, 2018

The general failure of the corporate press to condemn Canadian complicity in Saudi Arabia's horrible conduct.

Baird’s Gold Standard on Saudi Human Rights

As Harper’s UN spokesman, John Baird used to say “I refuse to go along to get along”, at least when the slightest criticism of Israel was involved. Lately, the previous foreign affairs minister has embraced a newfound flexibility as a paid advisor to Barrick Gold, a Canadian company with mining interests in Saudi Arabia.

A well-connected individual like Baird must be aware that Saudi Arabia recently sentenced a female political activist to death by beheading, nevertheless, he scolded Canada. Baird’s recent appearance on Saudi state TV; demanding a Canadian apology to that regime, marked a new low among former Canadian political figures.

Baird and the Saudi government were offended by a recent Liberal government Tweet requesting the release of human rights activists. Hardly a declaration of war but a possible problem for Baird’s current employer. Barrick is naturally concerned about the possible repercussions of the Tweet by current Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland. Under Harper, mining companies were expected to police themselves under a sort of ethical “honor system.”

The Canadian mining giant is sensitive about human rights, having often been accused of ignoring local worker’s welfare as well as environmental concerns in New Guinea, South America and Africa. Baird may decide that it’s safe to address Saudi human rights concerns after Barrick has done its work in the desert.

For now, though; protecting investor rights at the expense of Saudi human rights appears to be Baird’s ethical gold standard. In this practice, he is hardly alone.