Coffee and Collusion: Justice in Small Town Ontario | Unpublished

Warning message

  • Last import of users from Drupal Production environment ran more than 7 days ago. Import users by accessing /admin/config/live-importer/drupal-run
  • Last import of nodes from Drupal Production environment ran more than 7 days ago. Import nodes by accessing /admin/config/live-importer/drupal-run

Unpublished Opinions

Mindy-Simms's picture
Smiths Falls, Ontario
About the author

"I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore."

-Network, (1976)

Like it

Coffee and Collusion: Justice in Small Town Ontario

October 10, 2016

In April 2015, I pocket dial an old friend. That simple mistake changes the entire course of my life. Video of first contact with child protection agency here,

July 2015

I am served with a child protection application for a supervision order through the courts.

Voicemail recordings,

August 2015

I go to the family legal advice clinic at the court for some legal advice. They tell me to get legal-aid and get a lawyer. Worst advice ever.

September 2015

I remember the lawyers. I remember my lawyer’s remarks about how he could work with one of the agency’s lawyer, but couldn’t stand the other. Same lawyer also told me he knew the worker who swore an affidavit against me. He said she was good. I remember same lawyer not filing my responding materials before the first court appearance. I remember same lawyer being mad at me for filing it myself the following week. He told me,

“If there is nothing on file when you go to court and you have a lawyer, that’s not your problem. That’s the lawyer’s problem.”

Recordings of lawyer,

December 2015

The child protection agency withdraws their application for a supervision order, the day the judge would read my responding materials.

January 2016

Court is over and the child protection file is closed. I am now allowed to file a complaint about the services I received, and feel safe about doing so. I send in my first complaint letter.

February 2016

We move through the complaint process, a process even more convoluted and compartmental than anything I had experienced in Family Court. During thorough research, I learn many structural reasons that experiences with a child protection agency can go so wrong and actually hurt children. I record a two-hour interview with the agency’s Director of Service. I respond to this interview with another complaint letter, citing the video and where to find it. I voice my concerns to the agency, their Board of Directors, the CYS Minister at the time, the Premier, and both MPP’s that represent the jurisdiction of the agency, as well as several media outlets and lawyers. One MPP writes me back, but not my MPP so the help he can offer is limited. The child protection agency has other ideas of how they are going to handle my complaint and what I was complaining about.  

Second complaint letter,

Interview video,

March 3rd, 2016

I receive the first letter. It respectfully requests that I cease public posting of their agency documents and letters.

April 7th, 2016

I receive the second letter that “acknowledges again” that they are aware of my public postings and respectfully request that I stop.

April 21st, 2016

My house is raided in the middle of the night. Door kicked down, handcuffs and all. They take all computers and cell phones in the house.

August 8th, 2016

My husband and I are officially charged with five criminal offences, and one provincial offence.

October 3rd, 2016

I look to find my name on the docket. It says courtroom one, first appearance. I go to courtroom one. It’s a lot of nervous hellos mixed with gaze avoidance, something I’ve gotten use to since being hauled through Family Court the previous year. I know a lot of these people, accused and otherwise. It is a lot of the same faces. Same lawyers. Even duty counsel I recognize from the family law legal clinic. He was the one who gave me the worst advice ever. He is also married to the head lawyer of the child protection agency that had brought me to Family Court last year. The matter is stayed for two weeks.