Contributor's
The public consultation format Calgary used to spend the $52 Million is the same approach I...
June 20, 2013
Dear Editor, I was very pleased to read in the paper this morning (http://bit.ly/11iFnfJ) that...
June 6, 2013
I’ve made this argument so many times, many times on your site (The Bulldog), but here it is...
June 10, 2013
This is really good news! The final paragraph in the Mayor's motion is exactly what I said in my...
June 4, 2013
Dear Sens fans, Help Daniel Alfredsson make his decision on whether or not he'll stay on as the...
June 3, 2013
Its unbelievable really. The more criticism the Mayor receives for his lack of transparency and...
May 30, 2013







Comments by James O'Grady
Yes, I agree. They could have, and should have, negotiated a better deal.
Which are?
We left it open ended so people could fill in the blank on their own. Chance at governing, or gaining seats, or holding the Liberals to account, or passing more social legislation, or replacing the Liberals as the progressive voice of Canadians, etc.
I voted: UnsureI haven’t heard anything about eliminating poverty from the NDP since Singh has become leader. You would think that a Guaranteed Annual Income would have been the first thing they pushed the Liberals for. Instead they chose universal dental care. Also an important program but it doesn’t address poverty, which one would think would be the NDP’s #1 priority.